The Emergence of Social Entrepreneurship in the Non-Profit Sector

October 2002

 

Co-authors:  

Pam Cavender Curry, Executive Director

Marilyn Wrenn Harrell, Director of Planning and Development

Center for Economic Options (CEO)

214 Capitol Street, Suite 200

Charleston, West Virginia 25301

(304) 345-1298 (phone)

(304) 342-0641 (fax)

www.centerforeconomicoptions.org

info@economicoptions.org

 

Introduction

Social entrepreneurship is gaining attention throughout the nonprofit sector. A growing number of progressive nonprofits are taking responsibility for their own survival by increasing financial self-sufficiency while lessening, or even ceasing, their dependence on philanthropic giving and government subsidy.  Why? Through social entrepreneurism, an organization can experience a self-determination that breaks the bonds that often tie activities to sources of funding. There is freedom in becoming a social entrepreneur - freedom to operate with agility and creativity so often missed due to funding restrictions. Social entrepreneurs also face the same risks that challenge for-profit businesses. However, by combining the best of the not-for-profit, philanthropic world with the best of the for-profit, enterprising world, social entrepreneurs can increase their potential to reach more, serve more, change more and see their vision become reality.

 

Key Ideas

·                    Social entrepreneur:

A social entrepreneur is a mission-focused non profit organization that operates as a business and creates revenues by responding to market forces. This type of organization serves its social mission and also reinforces it by using private-sector tools and strategies. The social entrepreneur generates a stable and sustainable source of revenue by paying attention to, and benefiting from, the marketplace. Strategies can include the creation of social purpose enterprises, as well as income earned through fees for services, sale of program-related materials, consultation fees, etc.  Social entrepreneurs must manage a dual bottom line -- mission-related results and financial results.

 

 

 

 

 

 

·                    Social purpose enterprise:

Social purpose enterprises are designed to achieve a social, as well as a financial mission. Successful commercial ventures of social entrepreneurs are most often related to their mission.

 

·                    Considerations for organizations that are exploring social entrepreneurship:

This strategy for sustainability usually requires a significant shift in the organization’s culture – the way it operates, thinks about itself and the way it acquires funding and investments. Not unlike the private sector, this shift also includes an aggressive focus on its business practices including customer satisfaction and high quality service. The non-profit must also build an entrepreneurial orientation that recognizes opportunity, responds to market-forces and uses resources efficiency. The organizational culture must support a high tolerance for ambiguity, a willingness to take risks, integrity, trust, and enthusiasm. A results-focus on the dual (social and financial) bottom line will require strong integrated systems, advanced problem solving ability, and acute observation and listening skills.  Social entrepreneurship requires looking long and hard at program needs, opportunities, and financial support. Sometimes, painful steps are necessary in order to concentrate on the most effective program elements. It is likely that the board and staff will experience needed changes in personnel to accommodate this entrepreneurial shift. The organization’s funding sources may also need to be realigned in order to support the entrepreneurial strategy. A social entrepreneur does not necessarily look and operate like a traditional nonprofit organization, and funders will need to understand how best to invest in these hybrid business structures. It is important to stress that the transition to social entrepreneurship is not easy and may not be an appropriate strategy for every nonprofit organization.

 

·                    Relevance to the microenterprise field:

Microentrepreneurs understand the importance of maintaining competitive advantage through exploring niche markets, high customer satisfaction and diversification. Social entrepreneurs must mirror these business realities. Social entrepreneurs working in the microenterprise field are often pulled into the marketplace along with their clients as business partners and fellow entrepreneurs. The social entrepreneur is seeking similar financial rewards and assuming similar business risks as those they serve.

 

For the microenterprise field, social entrepreneurship, with its emphasis on both financial sustainability and greater program impact, can help overcome the risks of over-reliance on, and  the lack of flexibility and sheer scarcity of traditional funding.  When successful, the social entrepreneur has the opportunity to “go to scale” with the capacity to capitalize and develop new and better mission-related services that directly benefit the targeted population.

 

 

 

 

 

Center for Economic Options - West Virginia

 

Center for Economic Options (CEO) has emerged as a social entrepreneur – targeting its core mission while recognizing and profiting from market forces.  CEO’s strategy is to develop a “program” of enterprises as economic engines in West Virginia – the heart of Appalachia. These enterprises will assist small-scale manufacturers in the rural, mountainous communities of the state with accessing niche markets for their products. CEO’s track record for starting and operating such ventures includes the development and launch of [1]Appalachian By Design and, more recently, the start-up and operation of the Showcase West Virginia retail store in the Charleston, West Virginia.

 

CEO is designing a portfolio of market-focused social purpose enterprises to generate economic and social returns on investments. It is anticipated that these enterprises will generate sustainable program-related revenue to CEO.

 

The planned social purpose enterprise portfolio includes:

·        Showcase West Virginia retail store – CEO opened this store as a result of a market-based opportunity, not as a result of an enterprise planning process. Responding to an invitation by the state’s largest urban shopping mall in September 2000, CEO partnered with two business clients, provided funding, and in October, opened a 480 square foot retail store for the holiday season. The store featured the products of nearly fifty small-scale manufactures, with CEO employees, part-time workers, and volunteers serving as staff. At the close of December 2000, CEO realized that it was operating a dynamic social purpose enterprise. The Showcase West Virginia store was meeting the demand of CEO’s business clients by providing a vital urban market and related technical assistance. Store customers responded positively to the high quality, West Virginia made products. At the end of the three month pilot phase the ability to generate positive outcomes both programmatically and financially convinced CEO to shift to an access-to-market strategy and begin formal operations as a social entrepreneur.

 

Now in the midst of its second year of development, CEO is operating the Showcase West Virginia store in a 3000 sq. ft. retail sales space. It currently features the products of 200 small-scale manufacturers (who are CEO clients), and has five full-time, and numerous part-time staff. These rural business owners from around the state reach a high commerce urban market and receive custom market-related information and technical assistance. Within the first year of operation (2001-2002), in a smaller space, the store generated [2]$306,000 in gross revenue which, less sales taxes, was divided on a consignment basis between the participating businesses and CEO. As a result of operating as a business partner within the market economy, CEO has determined that client satisfaction with services has increased significantly. CEO will explore both print and Internet based catalogues for increased sales and marketing opportunities. CEO will consider opening Showcase West Virginia stores at additional locations if/when feasible and merited.

 

·        Showcase West Virginia Shows – CEO is testing the feasibility of brokering this opportunity for Showcase West Virginia entrepreneurs who desire, and have the capacity for, growth through accessing wholesale and larger retail markets for their product lines. Business owners who participate in the shows selected by CEO receive targeted training, partial booth underwriting, coaching during the show(s), and follow-up services. Examples of such market venues include the Chicago Fancy Foods Show (2002) and the Atlanta Gift Show (2003).

 

·        Premium/Commemorative Gifts – CEO is designing this enterprise to create markets within the broader business community. Corporations, organizations, and political entities want their message to stand out in this highly competitive information age. Many are turning to locally produced handcrafted, individualized items to present as corporate gifts, incentives and awards, advertising specialties, and thank you premiums. CEO will broker orders between the business markets and a selected set of Showcase West Virginia microentrepreneurs. CEO is simultaneously conducting market outreach and collecting custom product options and specifications from participating Showcase West Virginia businesses that want a slice of the $7 billion promotional item industry..

 

·        The Mountain Marketplace distributorship - CEO is designing a distributorship that will enable the sale of selected West Virginia-made products to a wider range of retail outlets. By identifying and packaging the top-selling products of the Showcase West Virginia store, CEO will be able to “sell” a diverse, interesting and customer-proven collection of lines while giving buyers a single point of contact for reorders, shipping, billing, etc. 

 

CEO is dedicated to pursuing innovative strategies to ensure the financial stability, sustainability, and continuation of these social-purpose enterprises. The enterprises are designed to generate streams of unrestricted, program-related income to CEO. The Showcase West Virginia retail store, for example, is consignment-based, with CEO earning a percentage of all sales. Sales over the past year suggest that if this enterprise meets projections, revenue generated will support a significant portion of CEO’s budget. However, enterprise development is a long-term strategy and in the interim, CEO is continuing to seek investment from foundations, governmental agencies, corporate donors, and private philanthropists.

 

Challenges

·                    Social entrepreneurs walk a fine line between the non-profit and for-profit worlds. Social entrepreneurism brings opportunities for significant programmatic and financial rewards, but the challenges and risks are those faced by any business in a competitive marketplace. CEO’s staff constantly balances the profitability of its social ventures with the level of service being provided to its clients. As the Showcase West Virginia retail store prospers, CEO is generating revenue to underwrite continued program work. At the same time CEO’s clients prosper due to direct sales, additional marketing opportunities, and marketing training and technical assistance. CEO’s impetus for success is great. The pressure therefore is to run a successful business while finding strategies to provide technical assistance (which is not mandated by the program) to a population of entrepreneurs in a format that is both amenable and meaningful to them.

 

·                    When opportunity knocks, it is the entrepreneur that runs to open the door. The process of submitting a detailed proposal and multi-year workplan is not well-suited to CEO’s new direction, yet is consistently requested by traditional philanthropic and governmental funding sources. The challenge lies in being able to articulate the need for underwriting, and providing enough details to generate support without losing the flexibility to shift resources as needed to capitalize on opportunities. CEO continues to struggle with this paradox that will exist until the organization achieves financial self-sufficiency.

 

·                    CEO transitioned to an enterprise focus in a short period of time based on the opportunity to open the Showcase West Virginia retail store. Establishing systems and incorporating technology while concurrently developing and operating the social-purpose enterprise was an extreme challenge for the staff. While inherently entrepreneurial, the staff experienced a steep learning curve when it came to the nuts and bolts of enterprise management.

 

·                    CEO is challenged by cash flow issues that result from both market fluctuations and gaps between financial support from philanthropic and governmental sources. To take advantage of market opportunities, CEO has started social-purpose enterprises without full capitalization (e.g. Appalachian By Design and the Showcase West Virginia store). A traditional for-profit business may be more hesitant to do this. CEO took the risk that it could raise funds from traditional sources to cover program costs (i.e. training, pilot projects, community outreach, etc.) during enterprise start-up phase. To date, CEO has been successful in obtaining a portion of needed funding for this purpose. An initial risk/benefit analysis is underway to determine if this strategy has merit.

 

·                    The difference between the Showcase West Virginia retail store and other specialty gift stores may not be noticeable to the average customer. However, CEO staff is challenged by being constantly mindful that they are working with clients – not with vendors. . Since the store operates as a marketing incubator, participating business owners/clients run the gamut in terms of experience, professionalism, and responsiveness. This makes all activities, from re-ordering products, to individual technical assistance, extremely time and resource consuming.  Balancing CEO’s income generation potential with its social mission of providing access-to-markets for small-scale rural manufacturers is a constant challenge.

 

Lessons Learned: 

·        Just as starting a business is not for everyone, becoming a social entrepreneur is not right for every nonprofit. Most organizations can increase their efficiencies and/or recover a portion of program costs through fees and sale of products. However, entering the marketplace through the development of social-purpose enterprises often places the organization in unexplored and potentially risky territory.

 

·                    The nonprofit must have a competitive advantage to be able to offer the market something not being provided by the current competition. Finding a way to connect the social purpose enterprise with the organization’s core mission is one way to do this.

 

·                    Social enterprise development relies on Social Return on Investment (SROI) analysis to help track and evaluate the impact and value of the enterprise(s) on both economic and socio-economic levels (the dual bottom line). Emphasis on the dual bottom line results in increased attention to impact and accountability. This emphasis also allows subjective interpretations to be quantified. Such quantification is crucial for justifying continued development.

 

·                    CEO’s experience is that rural entrepreneurs are most likely to become engaged in its “program” activities and trainings when directly connected to specific marketing opportunities.

 

·                    Reflective of the Appalachian culture which tends to avoid debt – CEO eschews indebtedness. CEO finds that many small-scale entrepreneurs build their businesses incrementally, debt-free, through sweat equity and investing revenue back into their endeavors.

 

Current issues and observations:

·                    Financial stability – the social entrepreneur needs the latitude to dedicate most of its energies toward developing successful enterprises for its clients instead of continually focusing on fundraising efforts and cash flow issues.

 

·                    If not carefully managed, commercial ventures can divert attention from the mission of the nonprofit while adding little to the bottom line.

 

·                    Traditional philanthropic and governmental funding sources, by consistently asking the question, “How will this project or program be sustained after the grant period?” may be the impetus, to some degree, for the emergence of social entrepreneurism. Social entrepreneurs see opportunities in this question and are responding creatively.

 

Trends in this emerging field:

 

·                    National Gathering of Social Entrepreneurs

In 1998, six nationally known advocates of social entrepreneurship convened a “gathering” of people interested in the field. At this gathering, non-profit entrepreneurs, who previously had operated in isolation, came together for the first time to discuss best practices, share knowledge and advocate for a national non-profit social venture agenda NGSE is exclusively devoted to providing support for nonprofit social entrepreneurs. More than half of the members are practitioners, the rest are funders, academics, and for-profit businesses. The nonprofit members include both early stage entrepreneurs seeking the nuts and bolts knowledge to start and run a social purpose venture and established social entrepreneurs seeking an opportunity to exchange ideas with other pioneers of the field. NGSE’s 4th National Gathering for Social Entrepreneurs will be held December 4-6, 2002 in Minneapolis, MN. www.nationalgathering.org

 

·                    Association for Enterprise Opportunities

AEO is a national association of organizations committed to microenterprise development. AEO provides its members with a forum, information, and a voice to promote enterprise opportunity for people and communities with limited access to economic resources. With the growing awareness of social entrepreneurship, AEO plans to offer a Social Entrepreneur track at the 2003 AEO Annual Conference May 16-19 in Denver, Colorado. www.microenterpriseworks.org.

 

·                    WSEP Ventures, Inc., Chicago, Illinois

WSEP Ventures is a nonprofit venture built on a dynamic business model that creates social impact while contributing to organizational financial sustainability. WSEP Ventures is a subsidiary of WSEP Futures, which acts as a holding company of both WSEP Ventures and the Women’s Self-Employment Project (WSEP).  WSEP Ventures was started in 2000 as a new social enterprise organization for the purpose of  launching and managing a portfolio of businesses that overtime support the unrestricted revenue of the original Women’s Self-Employment Project.  The portfolio currently has two businesses, the WSEP Consulting Group, a strategy and management-consulting firm, and CLW Foods, which manufactures and distributes unique food items created by disadvantaged entrepreneurs. WSEP Ventures will continue to seek opportunities to create new businesses that strengthen benefits to low-income communities, leverage WSEP Ventures’ core competencies, and emphasizes a strong financial and social rate of return on investment.

 

Reasons why WSEP Ventures’ social enterprise model is an attractive business opportunity for the WSEP Family of Companies:

  1. It creates both social and financial impact – the consulting firm is helping its clients solve complex social problems¾its profits have supported the parent company for its first two years.
  2. It offers nonprofits a business model for the future – innovation has always been a hallmark of the Women’s Self-Employment Project and Ventures continues that legacy by modeling a unique business strategy. Through Fusion Managementä, a product of the consulting firm, the key framework and principles of the model are spread by consulting, executive retreats and coaching to other social entrepreneurs.
  3. It allows WSEP to continue its award-winning work with low income women¾the institutional model of the WSEP Family of Companies allows each entity to focus on its strengths through a shared vision. As a CDFI, WSEP focuses on its ability to connect women to the greater economy, while Ventures focuses on its ability to harness the market place for business opportunities.
  4. It helps WSEP move toward financial sustainability – a sole focus on microenterprise development will not allow WSEP to be financially sustainable in the long term. Strategically planned, WSEP Ventures has been developed to contribute nearly 30 percent of WSEP’s internally generated revenue.

 

As the WSEP Family of Companies moves into its third year, all indications are that the model works. WSEP is as strong as ever and WSEP Ventures is demonstrating its ability to generate profits. cevans@wsep.com

 

 

 

 



[1] Between 1992-1995, CEO developed a brokering and training program called the Appalachian Knitwear Network which linked home-based commercial knitters from across the state. In 1995 CEO legally separated this program into an independent non profit enterprise known as Appalachian By Design which continues to operate in West Virginia

 

[2] CEO uses a 55/45 consignment arrangement, with 45% of retail sales retained by CEO as unrestricted income. Analysis is ongoing to determine break-even points and Showcase West Virginia’s potential for profitability. CEO’s goal is to generate sufficient revenue through its various enterprises to achieve financial self-sufficiency by 2010.